From e0f9f8586a0b21fb3c7a4ead3804008d57dfdef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Herbert Xu Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:56:18 -0700 Subject: [IPV4/IPV6]: Replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh In light of my recent patch to net/ipv4/udp.c that replaced the spin_lock_irq calls on the receive queue lock with spin_lock_bh, here is a similar patch for all other occurences of spin_lock_irq on receive/error queue locks in IPv4 and IPv6. In these stacks, we know that they can only be entered from user or softirq context. Therefore it's safe to disable BH only. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv6/raw.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/ipv6/raw.c') diff --git a/net/ipv6/raw.c b/net/ipv6/raw.c index 617645bc5ed6..e2b848ec9851 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/raw.c +++ b/net/ipv6/raw.c @@ -434,12 +434,12 @@ csum_copy_err: /* Clear queue. */ if (flags&MSG_PEEK) { int clear = 0; - spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); if (skb == skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) { __skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue); clear = 1; } - spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); if (clear) kfree_skb(skb); } @@ -971,11 +971,11 @@ static int rawv6_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, unsigned long arg) struct sk_buff *skb; int amount = 0; - spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); if (skb != NULL) amount = skb->tail - skb->h.raw; - spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); return put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg); } -- cgit v1.2.3